|
|
August 30
Dozens of people, mostly women, ride on 'mehadrin' buses in which men and women sit separately and sit at front of bus in protest. Protesters demand an end to discrimination that forces women to sit at back of bus for modesty reasons. Protesters make sure to respect religious ban on coming in physical contact with opposite sex
Roy Elman
The protest against gender-segregated bus lines stepped up. Dozens of protesters, mainly women, rode en masse on buses labeled 'mehadrin lines' in Jerusalem in which women must sit at the back of bus out for modesty reasons.
Under the banner "Free transportation day – putting an end to discrimination in public spaces," the protesters flocked early in the morning on Sunday to 'mehadrin line' bus stops. When the buses arrived, they sat in the men's section at the front of the bus. The protesters, among them members of city council Laura Wharton and Rachel Azaria, wore red bracelets on their wrists as a sign of their protest and distributed to the passengers information booklets against the controversial separation between the sexes.
| Segregation |
|
| Haredi women moving up |
|
|
Haredi women sick of sitting in back of segregated buses, file a petition with High Court to change situation |
| Full Story |
| | |
"We are acting as responsibly as possible. We instructed all our male and female activists to act respectfully and to dress appropriately," said Ella (Academia without Harassment) Spokesperson Shiran Dadon. "We instructed all of our activists not to sit next to bachelor yeshiva students and for men not to sit next to women out of respect of their desire not to come in physical contact with the opposite sex."
"We are not fighting against the haredi community or against Jewish religion, but against the scheme 'to hide' women under the robe of 'modesty.' We act with the most possible sensitivity, but also with the necessary determination in order to fight against the severe physical and verbal shows of violence that women are subjected to on these bus lines on a daily basis," explained Dadon.

Women protesting on the bus (Photo: Roy Elman)
Contrary to expectations, the protest did not provoke a violent response from the haredi public. Except a few shouts and threatening glares, no ultra-Orthodox passenger tried to forcibly block the women from sitting at the front of the bus. On one of the buses, a haredi passenger approached the driver to complain about the women sitting in the men's section of the bus, asking that the driver instruct her to move to the back. The driver ignored the request and kept on driving.
The 'mehadrin lines' started running a number of years ago in response to demands made by the haredi population. The Egged bus company responded to the request and has ever since operated a number of such lines in Jerusalem. The bus lines very quickly became a new source of friction between seculars and haredim.
In recent months, there have been an increasing number of reports of violence against secular people, mostly women, who rode on the 'mehadrin lines' and refused to sit at the back of the bus.
The fight against 'mehadrin lines' was initiated some two years ago when the Reform movement's Israel Religious Action Center petitioned the Supreme Court to shut down the lines. Public protest against the lines has recently been renewed following the convening of a special committee within the Transportation Ministry slated to discuss legalizing segregated bus lines. August 28
Voilà une info qui va attrister tous les antisionistes fans des terroristes spécialisés dans le lancé de roquette.
Toujours dans le cadre des préparatifs de Tsahal à la réception du Dome D'acier (Iran Dome), les forces de l'air ont achevé la mise en place du nouveau bataillon qui sera en charge du système de défense anti-missile de courte portée. Le mois dernier, ce dernier a été soumis par le ministère de la Défense à plusieurs essais. Résultat : "Iron Dome" fonctionne correctement et a pu intercepter plusieurs roquettes de types Qassam ou Katyusha. Mis au point par la société de Défense Rafael, le système devrait être opérationnel d'ici l'été 2010 et pourra dès cet instant intercepter les tirs de roquettes du Hamas à Gaza et du Hezbollah au sud-Liban, ont déclaré des responsables de l'armée de l'air. "Iron Dome" repère puis traque les projectiles à l'aide d'un radar perfectionné, avant de les intercepter grâce à un missile. La première batterie du système sera déployée le long de la frontière sud d'Israël. Elle comprend 4 lanceurs de 20 missiles chacun. Les soldats du nouveau bataillon sont parmi les membres des unités des forces de l'air déjà existantes et suivent déjà un entraînement sur des simulateurs.

Source : http://www.juif.org/go-blogs-17948.php
La version électronique de l'Encyclopédie juive russe a été mise en ligne, mercredi 26 août 2009, sur la toile mondiale. Les auteurs du site (http://www.rujen.ru/index.php/) espèrent que « l'accès interactif à l'encyclopédie permettra au public et aux spécialistes d'obtenir rapidement les informations qui les intéressent ».
Le site est fondé sur la version imprimée de l'Encyclopédie juive russe éditée à Moscou depuis 1994. L'ouvrage comprend trois parties constitutives: biographique, historique et thématique. Les aperçus historiques évoquent la vie des communautés juives dans la Russie d'avant la révolution de 1917, en URSS et dans les pays membres de la CEI. La section thématique présente les notions liées à la civilisation juive, l'apport des Juifs russes à différentes sphères d'activité, les associations sociales, scientifiques et culturelles juives. La version électronique de l'encyclopédie compte plus de 10.000 biographies et autant de toponymes. Elle a été créée avec le concours de la Conférence sur les réclamations matérielles juives contre l'Allemagne (Conference on Jewish Material Claims against Germany).
Photo : D.R.
Source : Ria Novosti |
Des survivants de la Shoah ont célébré mercredi 26 août le 65ème anniversaire de la liquidation par les nazis du ghetto juif de Lodz (centre de la Pologne), rendant hommage aux 200.000 habitants de cette ville qui avaient péri durant la Seconde guerre mondiale, rapporte le site Internet de 7sur7 Belgique, jeudi 27 août 2009.
« Le fait que nous soyons là signifie que nous avons gagné la guerre. Nous, la nation juive et les nations d'Europe restons vivants », a déclaré le chef de la communauté juive de Lodz, Simcha Keller, devant plusieurs centaines de personnes réunies devant l'entrée du cimetière. Les survivants du ghetto, tous octogénaires, sont arrivés de différents pays du monde, souvent accompagnés de leurs enfants et petits enfants, pour participer aux cérémonies commémoratives et réciter le Kaddish, la prière juive pour les morts. Ils se sont recueillis aussi devant un monument dédié à la liquidation du ghetto Rom, où environ 5.000 Roms d'Autriche ont été enfermés.
Photo : D.R.
|
L’acteur réalisateur Dany Boon, dans une interview au mensuel Psychologies, actuellement en kiosque, parle de ses quatre enfants Medhi, Noé, Ethan et Elia, qui n’ont pas tous la même religion, mais qui grandissent ensemble, sans que cela gêne quiconque…
« Mon père était musulman mais athée. Il chassait le sanglier en Kabylie. Ma mère est catholique et très croyante. J’ai été élevé dans la religion catholique. Ma conversion… J’ai toujours voulu être discret là-dessus, ça touche à l’intime, la conversion. Disons que le judaïsme me touchait beaucoup par différents aspects : la réparation par le rire, le rapport à l’autre… Il est plus grave d’offenser un homme que Dieu. Mais avant tout, ma conversion est un acte d’amour pour ma femme Yaël. Il était très important pour elle que l’on se marie à la synagogue… Ils (ses enfants) connaissent le mélange, et c’est beau, le mélange. Je suis moi-même un mélange et j’ai épousé une femme aux multiples origines, avec une mère séfarade et un père ashkénaze. L’avenir, c’est le métissage des peuples. Et ça fait de très beaux enfants. J’ai quatre enfants absolument magnifiques. »
Photo : D.R.
Source : Psychologies | August 26
Des plans de construction originaux du camp d'extermination nazi d'Auschwitz doivent être remis au Premier ministre israélien Benjamin Netanyahu jeudi 27 août, lors d'une visite officielle à Berlin, informe le Times, mercredi 26 août 2009.
Il s'agit de 29 documents découverts fin 2008 dans un appartement de Berlin et achetés par le quotidien Bild. Ces plans d'Auschwitz décrivent avec précision la taille et l'emplacement des chambres à gaz et des fours crématoires; ils « sont les seuls de ce type découverts jusqu'à présent en Allemagne », souligne le communiqué. Lors de leur découverte, le directeur des archives fédérales allemandes à Berlin, Hans-Dieter Kreikamp, avait jugé leur importance « extraordinaire »: « c'est la preuve authentique du génocide systématiquement planifié des Juifs d'Europe », avait-il dit.
Photo : D.R.
| August 25
Rav Ron Chaya affirme : "Guermamia, c'est le plus beau cours que j'ai jamais fait de ma vie. Dévoiler des vrais secrets de la Torah qui jusqu'aujourd'hui étaient inconnus" :
In a notable act of kindness between members of two hassidic movements that have a history of tense relations, a Chabad hassid from Teaneck, New Jersey, has donated one of his kidneys to a Satmar hassid from Williamsburg, Brooklyn.
The story, which first appeared on Chabad.org, Lubavitch's news Web site, comes as several negative organ transplant stories involving Jews have made headlines.
The latest was a Swedish newspaper report claiming the IDF was involved in illegal organ harvesting among Palestinians. Last month, an American Jew was arrested by the FBI for allegedly engaging in illegal organ trafficking.
In contrast, on August 13, Rabbi Ephraim Simon, co-director of Friends of Lubavitch and a father of nine, parted with one of his kidneys to save the life of a Satmar father of 10.
"It is interesting that what I did happened in the same news cycle as those other stories," Simon said, in a telephone conversation on Sunday with The Jerusalem Post from his home in Teaneck, where he is recuperating.
"I hope this goes to show that while bad news tends to get the most exposure, there is also plenty of good news to be reported as well. And I am just one of many people donating their kidneys to save another person. "It is providence that it happened now. I've been preparing for this moment for a year already."
What makes the story piquant in haredi circles is the long history of tense relations between Satmar and Chabad.
Satmar, virulently opposed to Zionism, has been critical of Chabad's aggressively pro-Israel stance. In the mid-80s a group of Chabad hassidim were attacked while they passed through a predominantly Satmar neighborhood in Brooklyn.
Satmar hassidim have also complained that Chabad has at times aimed its outreach efforts toward Satmar followers, in addition to unaffiliated Jews.
Simon said the fact that the recipient was a Satmar hassid was never an issue.
"It never entered my thought process. The Rebbe [Menachem Mendel Schneerson] always said that we must love every Jew."
Simon originally began thinking about donating a kidney a year ago, when a community Web site posted a notice that a 12-year-old girl was in need of one.
Simon, who at the time had a daughter aged 12, felt he could not ignore the call. He researched the possible dangers and found that there were no real risks involved. The operation was relatively simple. And it was possible to live with only one kidney without suffering any decrease in function.
The only risk was in a case in which one kidney suffered damaged or developed cancer, or if someone in the donor's family needed a transplant in the future.
"After discussing the matter with my wife we decided that I had to save that girl," he said.
In the end, Simon's kidney was not suitable for the girl. But the process ultimately led him to donate his kidney to the Satmar man, who suffered from a genetic disease that had killed several of his relatives and that was destroying his own kidneys.
Although he knew the recipient would be a religious Jew with 10 children, he did not know that he was a Satmar until a later stage.
"The recipient is doing phenomenally well. He is up and walking around," Simon said.
"The doctor said that it was as if he received a kidney from his own brother. It gives me a lot of strength to know that."
Chief Rabbinate tries to encourage religious public to become organ donors by resolving halachic quandaries surrounding process, issuing special donor card
Nissan Shtrauchler
The Chief Rabbinate is currently in the midst of resolving the last halachic quandaries surrounding organ donation, Yedioth Ahronoth reported Thursday.
The debate was sparked following the approval of the Organ Donation Law in 2008: The law specifies brain death criteria, as well as the exact medical methods and instruments which must be used to determine brain and respiratory death; but many in the religious community still feel it fails to answer pivotal halachic questions.
| Give Life |
|
| A mitzvah called organ donation / Efrat Shapira-Rosenberg |
|
|
Did you know that Israeli Jews have the lowest rates of organ donation of any ethnic group in the country? In a state that arose from the ashes of the millions who perished, the saving of life at any price could be expected to be the highest item on the national agenda. So why do we recoil from organ donation “for religious reasons”? |
| Full story |
| | |
In order to encourage organ donation among the religious public, the rabbinate decided to introduce a new organ donor card – different from the National Transplant and Organ Donations Center (ADI) card – which will stipulate that the potential donor's organs can be harvested only if and after brain death is determined according to the strictest letter of the law.
Chief Rabbi of Israel Yona Metzger also wants the Chief Rabbinate's Council to issue an official decree giving the law a halachic seal of approval.
The rabbinate will hold a special seminar on organ donation, meant to allow the 40 rabbis attending it to eventually be able to see families through the process.
The rabbis will be trained to offer the families answers to any medical or halachic questions they may have.
"The council approved organ donation 20 years ago, providing that the state of brain death was determined not only by a physician, but by electronic equipment as weel, but the medical community never agreed to that stipulation," a source in the Chief Rabbinate told Yedioth Ahronoth.
"The new legal criteria seemingly took care of that and now the rabbinate is in the process of giving it a halachic seal of approval."
While the majority of rabbis in the religious- Zionist, haredi and Sephardic communities – including Chief Sephardic Rabbi Shlomo Amar – agree that brain death is an indication of death-proper, some in the haredi community, especially followers of Rabbi Yosef Sholom Elyashiv, still oppose the correlation, claiming cardiac death should be the only criteria used.
For more on Ynet and ADI's Book of Life project click here
Ancient community dwindles as external pressures in poor, strife-stricken country make life increasingly difficult for remaining community members. Shiite revolt in north, increasing Sunni alliance, murder of community member last year all incentives for Jews immigrating to Israel in growing numbers
Reuters
Three more Jewish families will leave Yemen for Israel this week, according to a Yemeni rabbi who laments the dwindling of an ancient community unnerved by threats and by the murder of a Jew last year.
A Shiite revolt in the strongly tribal northern mountains and the growth of Sunni Islamist fervor in Yemen have made Jews uncomfortable in a land where they have deep roots.
Only 200 to 300 Jews still live among Yemen's 23 million Muslims, mostly in the north.
| Aliyah |
|
| Jewish family flees Yemen in secret operation |
|
|
After a grenade was tossed towards his home, Sa'adia Ben Yisrael decided the time had come for his family to leave the town of Raida for Israel |
| Full Story |
| | |
Rabbi Yahya Yusuf Musa, 31, told Reuters the three families were from Raida, a town about 70 km (45 miles) north of the capital Sanaa, where a Jew was killed in December by a Muslim compatriot who has been sentenced to death for the crime.
Sixteen Yemeni Jews from Raidah moved to Israel in June, including relatives of the victim, Mashaa Yaeesh al-Nahari.
An official at Israel's immigration ministry declined to comment due to the sensitivity of the subject.
Israel organized the departure of about 50,000 Jews, the bulk of a once-vibrant minority famed for its craftsmen, to the newly created Jewish state in 1949.
Last year Rabbi Musa was among 67 Jews forced to leave the village of Al Salem in the northern province of Saada after threats by Shi'ite rebels known as Houthis, whose intermittent five-year-old revolt flared again this month.
Ultimatum
"The Houthis kicked us out," Musa said, recounting attacks on property, theft of religious books and other abuses. "They gave us 10 days to leave, or they would kidnap and kill us."
Evacuated to Saada city and then flown by helicopter to Sanaa, the Jews of Al Salem now live in government-supplied housing with a small monthly stipend and food rations.
The government accuses rebels, led by Abdel-Malek al-Houthi, of seeking to restore Islamic rule by the Zaydi imamate which was overthrown in 1962. Zaydis, which belong to a branch of Shi'ism, are a minority in mainly Sunni Muslim Yemen.
Musa, who works as a silversmith, said the 15 families from Al Salem felt secure in Sanaa, unlike their counterparts in Raida. Their children go to school and play with young Muslims.
"We have no intention of leaving the country because our birthplace is beloved," he said when asked if they planned to go to Israel. "We prefer to live in safety and security in Sanaa."
Musa said President Ali Abdullah Saleh had looked after the Jews from Al Salem, but said his promise to transfer them from Amran province, where Raida is located, had not worked out.
"Their concern and fears increased day by day. This forced them to leave the country because they had no other option."
Saleh's government is publicly supportive of the remaining Jews, as is the main Islamist opposition party, Islah.
"The Yemeni Jews are citizens. They should have their own life as Yemenis," said Mohammed al-Sadi, the party's assistant secretary-general. "I prefer for them to stay in Yemen, not move to another country, because they are part of this society."
But, the tiny Jewish remnant faces an uncertain future.
"If there is deterrent action against those who threaten the Jews, then even those who migrated would be ready to return," said Musa, the rabbi. "As for those who are left, if there is security for themselves, for their families, for their possessions, they would have no reason to leave their homeland."
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Photo: Ron Ben Yishai
© All Rights Reserved | August 19
Reportage de la télé israélienne (en hébreu) d'une femme juive mariée à un arabe de Jérusalem et ses 8 enfants, maltraitée, sauvée par l'association juive religieuse "Yad Leahim" anti-missionnaire :
August 18
Le scénariste de bandes dessinées Philippe Richelle semble vouer une passion à l'époque de la seconde guerre mondiale qu'il racontait déjà dans « Amours fragiles ». Centré sur la Rafle du Vélodrome d'Hiver, le diptyque « Opération Vent printanier » (le nom de code de la rafle du Vél’ d’Hiv) pose la question de l'engagement individuel des personnages, qui ne sont ni des héros, ni des salauds.
Richelle s'attache à montrer les réactions combien humaines de chacun devant la montée de l'hystérie anti-juive. Il stigmatise le comportement de la police française qui a collaboré avec l'occupant de manière trop zélée. Bien peu de policiers se sont rebellés contre les directives et pourtant, beaucoup d'entre eux ont été fêtés à la Libération. Philippe Richelle campe des gens ordinaires qui se révèlent dans la tourmente d'événements qui les dépassent. Il nous brosse également un portrait précis de la situation sociale et économique de l'époque, et montre jusqu'où les allemands pouvaient aller dans leur folie de la discrimination.
« Opération Vent printanier », textes Phillipe Richelle, dessin Pierre Wachs, éditions Casterman | August 17
Chanson "one day" du chanteur américain Matisyahu.



Comme vous pouvez l’imaginer, je ne suis pas du tout contre la présence du Mémorial de l’Holocauste (je déteste ce mot) dans la ville de Berlin. Bien au contraire, je mesure les difficultés auxquelles ont été confrontés les politiciens allemands lors de la prise d’une décision aussi grave pour rendre hommage rendu aux millions de Juifs assassinés pendant les heures les plus sombres de l’Histoire allemande. Le génocide organisé par les autorités nazis dans l’ensemble des territoires qu’elles contrôlaient pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale est toujours contesté par de nombreux négationistes et un tel mémorial demeurera une plaie béante au coeur de la capitale. Il est censé être pour les générations futures une sorte de post it leur rappelant qu’aucune nation dite civilisée ne peut prétendre un jour ne pas pouvoir basculer dans le meurtre de masse et la barbarie planifiée. Le travail pédagogique réalisé dans les salles qui se trouvent sous le champs de stèles est absolument remarquable !
J’ai quitté la porte de Brandebourg en direction de la Potsdamer Platz et découvert l’oeuvre monumentale de l’architecte américain Peter Eisenman, les quelques 2 711 stèles (inutile d’en chercher la guematria ). Au delà du gigantisme, de la dimension de chacune d’elle, du caractère mouvant des chemins que le visiteur emprunte, des polémiques sur le choix de l’emplacement du Mémorial de la Shoah ou encore de l’entreprise Degussa qui avait produit le Zyklon B et fournit maintenant le revêtement antigraffiti… Ce qui m’a frappé en parcourant les allées est de voir ces dizaines d’adolescents jouer, rire et sauter au dessus des stèles. En fait, j’aurais très bien pu passer près de ce champs de stèles sans vraiment y prêter attention mais seulement voir les jeunes femmes faisant du jogging, les adolescentes faisant une pause ensoleillée et buvant leur jus de fruit ou d’autres encore se perdant dans un cache géant au milieu cette terra incognita. Un spectacle qui pourrait choqué mais après tout… intégrer dans la mémoire collective des vivants des moments tragiques du passé de l’humanité, n’est-ce pas là la raison d’être de ce mémorial ? Que dire de la conservation des camps de concentration et d’extermination qui sont appelés à disparaître progressivement de la surface de la terre…. August 13
Many years ago, while a rabbi in Atlanta, I answered a knock on my door one Shabbat afternoon. Standing in front of me was a fine-looking couple - obviously non-Jewish.
"Shabbat Shalom, rabbi," they said, and asked to have a word with me.
I sensed that they were missionaries and asked them what the subject was. They replied that they wanted to talk to me about the "Son of God."
I suggested that while I respected their personal beliefs, in Judaism there is no such thing as a son or mother of God, that ours is a very strict monotheistic faith, and that our God is one, not two, and not three. I added that before attempting to convert Jews, they should consider converting Christians to Christian teachings, because throughout history, Jews had seen very little of Christian love and of turning the other cheek.
End of conversation.
WELL, AT least they were honest. Today, missionaries are much more subtle.
For one thing, they often pose as Jews themselves. And, most significantly, they do not initially ask Jews to accept Jesus as the son of God, nor mention that in Christianity, Jesus is worshipped as a divine being.
Contemporary missionaries realize that Jews - even secular, non-religious Jews - have a visceral revulsion at the idea of a human being as divine. They also realize that, for Jews, the figure of Jesus symbolizes a church that has for millennia condemned Jews to purgatory and eternal damnation; that the church, in the name of Christian love, has been responsible for oceans of Jewish blood because of the Jewish refusal to accept Jesus as a divine being; and for the belief that Jews deserve to suffer because of this refusal.
Aware of all this, many contemporary missionaries have apparently altered their strategy. They are now appealing to Jews from a pseudo-Jewish perspective. In order to entrap Jews, in other words, much missionary activity has been Judaized. Jesus is no longer Jesus; he is now "Yeshua," a nice, Jewish-sounding name - as seen in recent missionary ad campaigns on Jerusalem's buses.
A close reading of some of today's missionary material shows that the central belief in the divinity of Jesus and his role as "lord and savior" is hardly mentioned. Today's emphasis is on his supposed role as messiah. Further, many missionaries themselves now refer to themselves not as Christians but as "messianic Jews." They wear yarmulkes, don a tallit, and even have their own "rabbis."
The State of Israel is a crucial target for such missionaries, and many so-called messianic Jews are actually born Christians who have given themselves Jewish names and moved to Israel for one reason: to proselytize Jews.
THIS NEW strategy is illustrated by several recent media articles. The Washington Post ran a news article on June 21, picked up from the Associated Press, about "messianic Jews" who claim that they are discriminated against in Israel - a questionable accusation. The article's description of messianic Jews made not a single reference to the divinity of Jesus. It slavishly followed the news release of the missionary group that issued it - which was careful not to mention the fact that so-called messianic Jews believe Jesus is the son of God.
Even The Jerusalem Post made no mention of the divinity of Jesus in its article last Thursday about the three-day messianic conference taking place that weekend.
An innocent reader comes away from such articles with the impression that "messianic Jews" are simply another group within Judaism. There are Orthodox Jews, hassidic Jews, haredi Jews, and there are messianic Jews - all part of one big, happy Jewish family
WHAT WE see here, in effect, is a renewed assault on the fundamentals of Judaism - not the traditional frontal assault, but, in a shift in tactics, one that attempts to infiltrate through indirect means by blurring the Jesus-as-God aspect of Christianity and stressing the Jesus-as-messiah aspect. Many missionaries feel this roundabout approach is less threatening to Jews, more "Jewish-friendly."
In view of this renewed offensive against the basic beliefs of Judaism, some obvious truths must be reiterated:
First and foremost is the cornerstone belief of Judaism: God is a pure and unadulterated One. He is singular, the unity of all unities, alone, unique, and indivisible. He cannot be transformed into two or into three - and certainly not into statues or figures. He is not and never was human, and he has no physicality, no father or mother.
Millions of Jews have gone to their deaths proclaiming Shema Yisrael - Hear O Israel, the Lord is our God, the Lord is One. Over and over again the Hebrew Bible prophetically warns against the inevitable attempts to dilute and distort this unity (see Deut. 13).
Further truths follow from this cardinal principle:
1. It is a distortion to claim that one can be a Jew and at the same time believe in Jesus as a god or as a messiah, or a prophet or savior.
2. It follows, therefore, that terms such as "Jews for Jesus," or "Jewish Christians" are grotesque perversions. Such terms are misleading, misguided, misconceived, and ultimately a miscarriage of truth - for no Jew can believe in any divinity other than the One God, and no Jew can view Jesus as anything other than a teacher of another faith system.
AS FOR the true identity of the Messiah, we have no specific knowledge, as Maimonides states in his Code, in Hilchot Melachim. In Judaism, the Messiah will not be a divine creature but a man born of a man and woman; he will inaugurate an era of universal peace, spirituality and enlightenment, and will gather in all Jewish exiles to the land of Israel, as outlined in Isaiah 11.
Jesus has not fulfilled any of these prophecies. Furthermore, he is worshipped as a deity by another faith. For converts to Christianity to claim that they are "messianic Jews" is thus another pathetic distortion.
Having said this, it is important to state that Judaism has no quarrel with those who choose not to follow the pure monotheism of our faith.
We are not a missionary religion, and the benevolent behavior of the modern State of Israel toward non-Jewish religious minorities demonstrates Jewish magnanimity to those who do not follow Jewish ways. We have only respect for those who wish to worship their own deity in their own way, and to live ethically and lovingly with all people. We condemn those who would demean or use violence against believers of another religion.
AT THE same time, missionaries should know that Judaism disdains those who would entrap unlettered Jews through deception and falsehoods. To try to persuade innocent Jews that there is no real difference between Judaism and Christianity - even when these attempts stem from "love and friendship" for the Jewish people - is an example of such deception.
We welcome genuine evangelical love and friendship and cherish evangelical support for the State of Israel. But evangelicals must realize that words like "love and friendship" are very hollow when they come at the price of apostasy and betrayal of the millennia-old faith of the Jewish people.
Jews understand that the conversion of the Jews to Christianity is a central tenet of many Christian sects. We know that missionary societies around the world budget many millions of dollars annually in order to "save" Jews. If this is a basic teaching of evangelicals, so be it. But Jews can learn from them. We too should be budgeting millions to save fellow Jews around the world, and especially in Israel, from ignorance and Jewish illiteracy.
The old secular Zionist order, in its haste to be accepted by the outside world, deprived entire generations of Israeli Jews of even elementary knowledge of our Jewish heritage - with the result that too many Jews have no idea of what Judaism stands for, or of the deep chasms that separate Judaism from Christianity.
We must become missionaries to ourselves. It is long past time for us to deliver serious Jewish learning to our people. This is particularly needed for newcomers to Israel from lands like Russia and Ethiopia, who are particularly vulnerable to the artful blandishments of clever missionaries. They, together with all Jews, need to know how to reply when the doorbell rings.
The writer, a rabbi in Atlanta for 40 years, is the former editor of Tradition magazine. The author of nine books, he presently serves on the editorial committee of the Encyclopedia of Mitzvot.
Ultra-Orthodox media concerned with spreading of swine flu epidemic asks the question: Can disease be contracted by kissing mezuzah? Seven doctors asked say all objects may be infectious, one doctor specifically recommends practice be avoided
Kobi Nahshoni
Wednesday morning, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center announced it would limit visits to maternity wards for fear of having patients and newborn babies infected with swine flu, and now, one of the hospital's doctors has also recommended people refrain from kissing mezuzot in public places.
A mezuzah is piece of parchment inscribed with a Jewish prayer affixed on doorframes of Jewish homes as a mitzvah.
Israel's Sephardic Chief Rabbi Shlomo Amar also addressed the issue, saying, "If a specific order is given in the matter, the mezuzah must be kissed from the air, to ensure that the custom is not forgotten."
The H1N1 epidemic is a cause of major concern worldwide, and ultra-Orthodox media has not overlooked it. Haredi reporter Ozel Vatik interviewed seven doctors - including Emergency Room directors and specialists on infectious diseases – on the risks of contracting the virus from kissing a mezuzah – a custom that is highly common among religious and traditional Jews.
The doctors unanimously agreed that bacteria leave high levels of residue on such objects, but six of them refused to comment on mezuzot in particular, "so as not to get in trouble with the rabbis".
Dr. Ilan Youngster, a pediatrician at Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, was the only doctor to link risks of infection with kissing the mezuzah, and he even took it one step further and recommended people refrain from doing so.
He based his recommendation on a study he presented about a year-and-a-half ago, in which 70 mezuzot from Assaf Harofeh were sampled and sent in for lab tests. The results were published on Ynet, and showed that all the mezuzot contained dangerous bacteria.
Youngster said then that the results of mezuzot in private homes were expected to be similar and explained, "Most of the bacterial colonies that were found were of bacteria that are found on the skin. Perhaps because of the fact that the mezuzah is a religious object, people are afraid to sterilize it."
Most of the mezuzot tested in the study included colonies of Staphylococcus Coagulase Negative, that can cause serious infectious diseases. The study also revealed E. coli bacteria that cause infections in the reproductive system and urinary tract, Klebsiella, which can cause various infections including pneumonia, and more.
Chief Rabbi Shlomo Amar was asked for his opinion on Dr. Youngster's recommendation and said he was not thrilled with the idea, at least as long as it is not adopted by the Health Ministry. The rabbi said, "If an official order is issued – I recommend anyone that wants to follow it put his hand near the mezuzah and kiss it, so as not to miss out on this good and important custom." August 11
When the Six-Day War ended and Israelis began streaming to the West Bank, members of the Molchadsky-Wolfson family from Jerusalem decided to visit Hebron. Thirty eight years earlier, the family had fled from that city following the massacre of Hebron's Jewish residents.
Yonah Molchadsky had given up hope of finding the little apartment in which her family had lived in Hebron. But her daughter, Geula Wolfson, and the other family members and friends who went along on the 1967 visit, were not prepared to give up. Finally the apartment was located; it had been turned into a workshop for girls.
Yonah Molchadsky, however, did not say a word about the horrors of the massacre that had led them to leave. The family put no pressure on her. When they returned to Jerusalem that evening, Yonah went to the kitchen and prepared food, and when they sat down to eat, her friend, Sarah Novoplansky said: "Now you must talk. Tell us exactly what happened that day."
So after 38 years, the silence was broken and Yonah spoke, "from beginning to end, without a tear or a tremble in her voice," recounts Novoplansky, who wrote everything down.
It was the story of a family who had survived the terrible day on which 67 members of Hebron's Jewish community were massacred. The story of their survival is connected with the birth of Geula, Yonah's second daughter. Last weekend, Geula Wolfson celebrated her 80th birthday, and at the birthday party she told the story "so that the grandchildren will know."
Geula's parents, Mordechai and Yonah Molchadsky, came to Palestine from Minsk in 1925. They hailed from well-to-do families and hoped the remaining family members would soon follow them. But this did not happen, and the family members who stayed behind perished in the Holocaust.
Mordechai was a forester, but he could not find work here. "They had a very hard life," says Geula. "Those were not easy times, they were years of being absorbed into a difficult country, of hopes that the parents and families would come, years of difficulties making ends meet. What did they have here? Nothing."
Mordechai was advised to open a laundry in Hebron. It was supposed to serve the yeshiva students in the town. "This made it possible to live," she says. "My parents never ever complained and they made do with what they had. Mother was aware of the need to make contact with the Arab neighbors and could speak Arabic even before she learned to speak Hebrew. Indeed, relations with the neighbors were very good. In December 1926, their first daughter, Rivka, was born."
In August 1929, Yonah was nearing the end of her pregnancy when, on August 23, the disturbing news reached them that there had been attempts to harm Jews in Jerusalem. The following day, Yonah started to feel labor pains and a doctor was called. "Don't give birth yet, wait a bit," he told her. But the pains got worse and the birth approached, so the family went to the neighboring family, an Arab family, who put them up in their basement.
As Yonah gave birth to her second daughter in the basement of the Arab family's house, the masses outside began looking for Jews. Yonah related, after many years of silence, that the mob came to the home of the Arab family, looking for the Molchadskys. "We have already killed our Jews," the Molchadskys' hosts and saviors told the mob, who believed them and departed.
The following day, the family - parents, 20-month-old daughter and the newborn baby - left Hebron to start a new life in Jerusalem. The baby was called Geula, "redemption" in Hebrew, "a name which had so much significance for them, a name with content," says Geula today.
The families who were saved from Hebron spread out over Jerusalem but kept in touch with one another. Geula recalls how they would visit each other, in "meetings of a shared fate, a difficult fate." But that terrible time was never mentioned at home. "Silence was part of life in those days. They wanted to hide the difficulties from their children and not to cry and be miserable. They wanted us to have an egg and a tomato every day and to have a good life, not to know worry, pain and difficulty. They wanted to save us from that."
Today Geula does not take part in ceremonies to mark the massacre. One time she went to a ceremony in Hebron, she says, and felt uncomfortable that her day of celebration fell on a day of mourning. But it is important for her that people remember that "that was an important day in the history of the Jewish people, a terrible day, but also the day I was born and because of the birth, my family was saved."
By Eli Ashkenazi
Related articles:
Settlers sue state over Hebron evacuation damages
After 8 years, Israel reopens Hebron road
The pogrom as heritage
Entré en fonction en janvier de cette année, celui qui définit la politique spirituelle de la communauté juive à d'importantes missions. Voix représentative des juifs de France, il doit réagir et adopter une position aussi bien sur des problématiques géopolitiques que sur des enjeux de société...
Pour faire face à ces multiples sollicitations, Gilles Bernheim sait prendre le temps de la réflexion et s’inspirer de l’enseignement de ses maîtres talmudistes, tout en demeurant pleinement impliqué dans les enjeux d’aujourd’hui et de demain, comme les questions de bioéthique sur lesquels il s’est investi depuis longtemps. L’un de ses ouvrages résume d’ailleurs cette synthèse, il s’intitule "Un rabbin dans la cité".
Le Grand Rabbin de France, agrégé de philosophie et diplômé du Séminaire Israélite de France, entretient, pour se détendre, une passion pour le sport en général, le football et le cyclisme en particulier. Ainsi, ce matin-là, petit break avant de revoir ses visiteurs : Gilles Bernheim interroge sa chef de cabinet, Barbara, sur une question relative à l’OM...
1. Idées Clé
2. Missions
3. Judaïsme et Religions
4. Fin de Vie
1. Ses trois idées-clé
a. Tradition et Modernité
S’inspirer de l’enseignement de ses maîtres talmudistes tout en demeurant pleinement impliqué dans les enjeux d’aujourd’hui et de demain.
La vision de la société civile de la communauté juive dépend de l’image perçue du Grand Rabbin de France. C’est une énorme responsabilité. L’interlocuteur de la communauté juive auprès des pouvoirs publics, la voix du judaïsme devant les non-juifs.
b. Donner à penser
La grandeur d’une religion réside dans sa capacité à donner à penser à ceux qui ne croient pas en elle.
Comment agir et s’exprimer au nom de tous les juifs de France sur des questions spirituelles comme sur les enjeux de société.
c. Ne jamais être sûr !
La crise que nous traversons m’a appris que le trop-plein d’assurance, de convictions, endort le pouvoir de réflexion. La recherche d’objectifs immédiats dans la société civile et économique n’a pas favorisé l’esprit du doute.
La remise en question est le propre de la pensée rabbinique. D’ailleurs le Talmud ne s’étudie jamais seul. Il s’étudie toujours à deux parce que l'on n’a jamais raison tout seul.
2. Ses Missions
Premièrement, en tant que Grand Rabbin, je suis le rabbin de tous les rabbins français. Je dirige une équipe, dessine des projets et surtout je suis à l’écoute des rabbins. Chaque Grand Rabbin veille à les aider à progresser dans des situations pratiques comme doctrinales. Mon rôle est en effet d’accompagner les rabbins dans leur quotidien.
Nombre d’entre eux exercent en région. Ils n’ont pas à leur côté des rabbins avec qui ils peuvent communiquer aisément. Cette solitude peut parfois conduire à un repliement. Quand un rabbin est confronté à un problème il est important qu’il puisse communiquer avec d’autres rabbins qui ont plus d’expérience. Ils pourront ainsi confronter leur épreuve à l’aune de ce que d’autres ont vécu dans des situations parallèles. Un enfant a besoin d’écouter, un adulte a besoin de parler et de communiquer son expérience.
Dans ce cadre, nous allons ouvrir cet été un site Internet, afin que le corps rabbinique puisse exprimer ses difficultés et partager les succès. Des hommes exceptionnels ont des réussites formidables. Certaines initiatives locales sont trop méconnues.
Le deuxième volet du métier me conduit à être d’une part l’interlocuteur de la communauté juive auprès des pouvoirs publics, et d’autre part la voix du judaïsme devant les non-juifs. Cela signifie que la vision de la société civile de la communauté juive dépend de l’image perçue du Grand Rabbin de France.
C’est une énorme responsabilité. Elle implique de s’investir dans des questions de société qui concernent non seulement les juifs, mais aussi tous les hommes. Le judaïsme est ainsi un vecteur de pensée et d’intelligence dans la cité. Être Grand Rabbin de France demande beaucoup de vigilance.
Attention à la Société
Je dois tout d’abord être à niveau et attentif à ce qui se passe dans le monde. Ensuite, il est nécessaire d’avoir une équipe d’experts autour de soi. A chaque actualité majeure, nous devons très vite confronter nos opinions à celles des autres.
Nous vivons à l’ère d’Internet. Un propos rapide, maladroit ou coupé de son contexte peut faire immédiatement le tour du monde.
En tant que Grand Rabbin de France, je veille à ne pas exprimer de sentiment personnel, mais le sentiment de la communauté. Le Grand Rabbin de France est le Grand Rabbin de tous les juifs de France. Nos points de vue doivent être suffisamment consensuels.
3. Judaïsme et religions
Q : Le confit politique entre Israël et le monde arabo-musulman constitue-t-il une grande entrave au dialogue judéo-musulman?
Grand Rabbin Bernheim: Oui, le conflit entre Israël et le monde arabe est un sérieux écueil pour le dialogue judéo-musulman. Il y a dans les Communautés juive et musulmane de France une volonté de couper, de séparer le dialogue judéo-musulman du problème du conflit israélo- palestinien -ce qui est parfois difficile- de manière à générer un véritable souffle, une véritable attention au vivre ensemble entre Juifs et Musulmans.
Q : En Europe, des leaders islamistes martèlent dans leurs prêches une rhétorique antisémite virulente. L’expansion de cet Islam fondamentaliste est-t-il inéluctable?
Grand Rabbin Bernheim: Oui, un discours extrêmement radicaliste est prêché dans certaines Mosquées en France.
C’est un discours anti judaïque, antioccidental, qui remet en question tous les acquis de la Renaissance et du siècle des Lumières en France. C’est un discours véhément, qui tente à faire de la France, même si ce n’est pas toujours dit de manière ostensible, une terre de conquête, de mission, de conversion à l’Islam.
Là, il y a lieu d’être inquiets, car ce phénomène touche aussi bien les Juifs que la République française ; les citoyens français ne doivent pas l’oublier!
Q : Dans un pays républicain comme la France, on a l’impression que le fait religieux est de plus en plus incompatible avec la laïcité?
Grand Rabbin Bernheim: Permettez-moi de m’attarder un instant sur le mot “laïcité”.
On parle beaucoup en France de “laïcité active”, de “positive”. La laïcité, ça ne se réduit pas à assurer que l’État garantisse une société sans ces problèmes, où les différences ne doivent pas s’afficher, ne fassent pas souci. La laïcité, c’est autre chose.
La laïcité, c’est la reconnaissance d’un nombre de valeurs françaises. Lorsqu’on parle de liberté, d’égalité, de fraternité, que signifient ces concepts, socle de la République?
La liberté, c’est par exemple le droit de quitter sa religion. Or, nous savons que nombre de courants de l’Islam ne le tolèrent pas.
L’égalité hommes/ femmes, ça veut dire qu’être Musulman, c’est accepter l’idée de résister au principe du patriarcat, c’est donner à la femme toute sa dignité, ses chances.
La fraternité, c’est l’appartenance à une même Mémoire, à une même Histoire. Nous sommes frères, ça veut dire que nous avons même père, mêmes origines. C’est donc pour vivre ensemble en respectant nos origines respectives et en essayant de construire un avenir où des religions différentes sauront cohabiter en bonne intelligence et avec cœur.
Voilà ce que c’est qu’être laïc en France. Ainsi, un Musulman, un Chrétien ou un Juif, ont un vrai travail à effectuer dans leur Communauté pour que ces valeurs républicaines, qui forment aujourd’hui le ciment de la laïcité française, soient respectées.
4. Le Rabbin et la fin de vie
Parmi nombre de sujets auxquels un rabbin est confronté, l’un des premiers et des plus difficiles est l’accompagnement de fin de vie. Un rabbin, comme un prêtre, un imam, un pasteur, est celui que l’on va chercher lorsqu’une personne est très gravement malade ou lorsqu’elle est en fin de vie. Or, cela ne s’improvise pas. Je ne parle pas des cérémonies ou du rituel mais de la présence et de la conduite au côté d’une personne.
La bonne volonté et les bonnes intentions ne suffisent pas. De telles situations se préparent sous l’autorité de personnes qui accompagnent les rabbins, leur soufflent des solutions, bref les aident dans ces moments particulièrement difficiles.
La loi relative au droit des malades et à la fin de vie, ou loi Leonetti, est bonne (loi qui assure la qualité de fin de vie au malade en dispensant les soins palliatifs et reconnaît le devoir de respecter la dignité du mourant). Lorsqu’un fait d’actualité est surexposé dans les médias, que la souffrance émeut jusqu’aux tripes, l’état de l’opinion peut très vite changer. Cette souffrance est inacceptable et la personne qui vit cette souffrance est une victime. Faut-il pour autant déplacer le curseur de la loi ? L’enjeu majeur n’est pas là.
Notre responsabilité est de promouvoir la formation des accompagnants. Je m’explique. Bien souvent les malades ont envie de mourir lorsqu’ils ne trouvent plus autour d’eux d’espérance et de désir de vivre. C’est normal. Une famille qui s’occupe jour après jour d’un personne atteinte d’une pathologie lourde ou en fin de vie peut avoir des moments de découragement et d’épuisement.
Dans ces circonstances, son regard tend à confondre la maladie et le malade. La maladie est horrible, mais pas le malade. Or si le malade voit dans le regard de l’accompagnant qu’il est horrible, il n’a qu’une seule envie : mourir. Plutôt que de promouvoir l’émotion devant la souffrance d’autrui, aidons les familles qui sont à bout de force à trouver des temps de récupération.
Yerouchalmi http://yerouchalmi.web.officelive.com
Study shows number of American Jews who define themselves as religiously observant has dropped by 20% in last two decades; Jews more likely to be secular than Americans in general
Associated Press
The number of American Jews who consider themselves religiously observant has dropped by more than 20% over the last two decades, as the share of Jews who consider themselves secular has risen, according to a survey.
| Heritage |
|
| Oldest active US synagogue opens visitors center / Associated Press |
|
|
Dedicated in 1763 by local Sephardic community, Touro Synagogue in Newport Rhode Island is the oldest in the US to still maintain an active Orthodox congregation. Its new visitor center aims to share places 'great story and history' |
| Full Story |
| | |
The 2008 American Religious Identification Survey found that around 3.4 million American Jews call themselves religious — out of a general Jewish population of about 5.4 million.
The number of Jews who identify themselves as only culturally Jewish has risen from 20% in 1990 to 37% last year, according to the study. In the same period, the number of all US adults who said they had no religion rose from 8% to 15%.
Jews are more likely to be secular than Americans in general, the researchers said.
About half of all US Jews — including those who consider themselves religiously observant — claim in the survey that they have a secular worldview and see no contradiction between that outlook and their faith, according to the study's authors.
Researchers attribute the trends among American Jews to the high rate of intermarriage and "disaffection from Judaism" in the United States.
The survey of more than 900 self-identified Jews has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.
The broader findings of the American Religious Identification Survey, based at Trinity College in Hartford, had been released last spring. The study began in 1990 and has been conducted about once-a-decade ever since.
|